UXPlatform capability
The primary question is not “What can I ask?” It is “What changed, what is at risk, and what requires my decision?” Today and the review queue rank urgent deltas with explainable scores so counsel spends time deciding.
A board of hundreds of matters punishes dashboards that decorate metrics. Luthor’s UX direction is a control room: urgent review items, approaching hearings, failed monitors, and matter risk, each ranked with a reason a junior can explain to a senior.
Selecting a fact, deadline, or proposition should scroll to the exact evidence span. Strategy versions use semantic diffs. The timeline distinguishes court events, agent proposals, human decisions, and operational actions so auditability is visible without a forensic export.
Full keyboard operation for the review loop, WCAG-minded contrast, status labels that do not rely on color alone, and mobile layouts that do not clip the order viewer are part of shipping to real chambers, not optional polish.
Luthor converts each new court event into a source-linked, deadline-aware strategy delta that a small litigation team can verify and approve, not a loose summary, a before/after change you can trust.
Always onLuthor watches active matters and re-plans when something material changes: the wedge against “never miss a hearing” alert tools that only ping, never think.
StrategyFor each matter, Luthor drafts a hearing-ready strategy grounded in the record and verified authorities, then revises it when the record changes, instead of leaving counsel with a stale note from last month.